<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:46:24 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blog</title><link>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:22:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-GB</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Eight Business Technology Trends to Watch</title><dc:creator>Nigel Paine</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:16:55 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/2010/3/11/eight-business-technology-trends-to-watch.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">101447:892711:6979469</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Whilst looking at McKinsey articles, I also came across <a href="https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/High_Tech/Hardware/Eight_business_technology_trends_to_watch_2080">this one</a>.It lists and explains those eight technology trends to watch out for, starting with, 'Distributing Cocreation' &nbsp;And again there is much to reflect upon in just a few hundred words of insight. I guess McKinsey is simply proving the efficacy of its eighth trend: &nbsp;'Making Businesses from Information.'</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6979469.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The Internet of Things</title><dc:creator>Nigel Paine</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:05:10 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/2010/3/11/the-internet-of-things.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">101447:892711:6979364</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/High_Tech/Hardware/The_Internet_of_Things_2538">Great McKinsey article</a>:</p>
<p>"But the predictable pathways of information are changing: the physical world itself is becoming a type of information system. In what&rsquo;s called the Internet of Things, sensors and actuators embedded in physical objects&mdash;from roadways to pacemakers&mdash;are linked through wired and wireless networks, often using the same Internet Protocol (IP) that connects the Internet."</p>
<p>McKinsey shares with you the impact of this on business. &nbsp;Well worth a read. &nbsp;McKinsey's have identified six kinds of impact in two distinct streams: <em>Information and Analysis</em> &nbsp;and <em>Automation and Control. </em>And don't forget to read the comments on the article. &nbsp;Note &nbsp;not just what is being said but who is saying it. &nbsp;This is an important area.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6979364.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Time Blocking</title><dc:creator>Nigel Paine</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:12:44 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/2010/3/9/time-blocking.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">101447:892711:6954547</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Great little video in <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com">Fast Company</a> about the need to take time to think and focus on big tasks rather than let yourself be continuously distracted. &nbsp;Simple to say, more difficult to do! The brain takes 15 minutes to declutter itself and prepare for a deep dive, yet many tasks get less than that time before the first interruption!</p>
<p>Distractions are caused by YOU, when you answer the phone, respond to an email or pick up your iPhone or Blackberry when it buzzes. &nbsp;By others when they talk at you, share musings, ask questions that they know the answer to, and generally get in your face. &nbsp;Your best work needs quiet and time to focus. &nbsp;The video recommends blocks of an hour before returning to the melee.</p><object width="512" height="313" id="embedded_player_f975f499540cb" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://video.fastcompany.com/plugins/player.swf?v=f975f499540cb&p=fc_social"><param name="movie" value="http://video.fastcompany.com/plugins/player.swf?v=f975f499540cb&p=fc_social"/><param name="allowfullscreen" value="TRUE"/><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"/><param name="base" value="http://video.fastcompany.com"/></object>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6954547.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Talent Management Part 2</title><dc:creator>Nigel Paine</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:06:04 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/2010/3/1/talent-management-part-2.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">101447:892711:6873953</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>If you read the blog post below this should resonate:</p>
<p>'A 2 percent economic growth rate for 15 years would increase the demand for executives by about a third. Meanwhile, supply is moving in the opposite direction: the number of US 35- to 44-year-olds will decline by 15 percent from 2000 to 2015. Companies must therefore make talent management a top priority, create and perpetually refine their employee value proposition, and source and, above all, develop talent systematically while removing underperformers.'</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mckinsey.com/">McKinsey's</a> in 1998!</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6873953.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Talent Management State of the Industry Report 2010</title><dc:creator>Nigel Paine</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:52:54 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/2010/3/1/talent-management-state-of-the-industry-report-2010.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">101447:892711:6873769</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Talent Management Magazine publishes an annual State of the Industry Report.&nbsp; If you have $495US you can read the whole thing, but they publish a free <a href="http://www.humancapitalmedia.com/eshop/categories/Research/Talent-Management-State-of-the-Industry-Report/">Executive Summary here</a>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>It is always interesting because it brings me down to earth.&nbsp; I always imagine huge shifts in how TM is perceived and how it is managed in companies, but the actual moves are much more modest.&nbsp; However, let's not get too depressed as the moves are all in the right direction.</p>
<p>Over 51% of programmes surveyed (721 companies mostly US-based) now see talent as an all employee issue.&nbsp; This is the first time this has ever gone over 50%. And 18% of respondents now claim to have a fully integrated TM operation (up 4% on last year). And -at last- the number of companies wehre TM goals, tactics and metrics are regularly reviewed by top execs to ensure alignment with organisational goals breaks 50% (52% actually).&nbsp; I still find it surprising that this figure isn't close to 100%. 19% say that the TM strategy is not aligned at all.&nbsp; That is pretty staggering.</p>
<p>The biggest challenge is still 'developing talent' which overshadows the next two challenges:&nbsp; recruiting talent and retaining talent. The recession has apparently shifted the focus from building talent to buying talent. So there is still scope for the imaginative, aligned learning leader to storm the barricades!</p>
<p>Anyway read it yourself.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6873769.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Social Networking in the Workplace</title><dc:creator>Nigel Paine</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:26:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/2010/2/4/social-networking-in-the-workplace.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">101447:892711:6559507</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The January edition of Learning Technologies Magazine was launched at the conference last week</p>
<p>I wrote my third <a href="http://www.learningtechnologies.co.uk/conference/"></a> <a href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/581142a7#/581142a7/14">article</a> on the topic of social networking and there is so much buzzing around that theme that it is worth mentionning here.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.nigelpaine.com/storage/social%20netin%20workplace.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1265297695262" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Jeanne Meister has published a short case study on Intel's use of social networking <a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2010/02/intels_social_media_employee_t.html">here</a> focussing on its social media training programme that over 20,000 staff have now completed.  And&nbsp; a whole bunch of social networking policy papers are&nbsp; available on line in a <a href="http://socialmediagovernance.com/policies.php">Social Media Governance database.</a></p>
<p>The Intel Guidelines Document is light touch and well thought out.&nbsp; You can look at it <a href="http://www.intel.com/sites/sitewide/en_US/social-media.htm">here</a>.&nbsp; Many organisations are attempting to develop their use of Social networking both for internal communications and knowledge transfer and external to build external links with customers.&nbsp; Intel itself has over 50 (what look like genuine) Twitter accounts ranging from job tweets to Intel ChipChitChat.&nbsp; Aimed at staff and customers alike. The main one: @Intel is aimed at customers and is designed to create a sense of a fun, committed and communicating company.&nbsp;</p>
<p>On an entirely different plain, ASOS the online clothes retailer, invites is followers to upload pictures of customers wearing <a href="http://www.asos.com/">ASOS</a> clothes out on a Saturday night.&nbsp; And draws attention to sale and special items.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6559507.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>What I Learned at #LT10UK</title><dc:creator>Nigel Paine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:15:22 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/2010/2/3/what-i-learned-at-lt10uk.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">101447:892711:6548251</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.nigelpaine.com/storage/lt10mk2.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1265225050776" alt="" /></span></span><a href="http://www.learningtechnologies.co.uk/conference/">Learning Technologies</a></p>
<p>is over for another year.&nbsp; I think I skipped a year so this is my first since 08.&nbsp; And I really enjoyed it for a number of reasons:</p>
<p>Great and enthusiastic people willing to talk and share</p>
<p>Some very good sessions, some unexpected</p>
<p>Catching up with friends and colleagues</p>
<p>General professional way it was organised:&nbsp; felt firmly under control</p>
<p>But what did I learn?</p>
<ul>
<li>Firstly that the learning and development community is vibrant and will to accept change.</li>
<li>Secondly that the recession has generated a lot of innovation</li>
<li>Thirdly Social networking is really taking hold</li>
<li>Fourthly that virtual worlds still need a lot of work to justify the effort and that effort might not best be put into Second Life</li>
<li>Words like rapid, in time and small scale are really indicative of a whole range of initiatives</li>
<li>Money is still a big issue but much social learning has been sold on the back of economy drives but that does not invalidate the result on the contrary...</li>
<li>"Civil society cannot be reduced to a digital free for all" Puttnam</li>
<li>We need some stats related to the UK market not just the US.</li>
<li>Deep specialists are required all over organisations and their expertised networked and made accesible</li>
<li>LMS = eLearning platform&nbsp; 2001 - 2003; Enterprise learning platform 2004 - 2007; Learning Portal 2008 -2010 (Josh Bersin)</li>
<li>Learning culture has a direct impact on organisational performance (Josh B)</li>
<li>At IBM you can look up the person you want to emulate and see what they are reading! (Josh B again)</li>
<li>"You hired them, why don't you trust them' Mark Oehlert</li>
</ul>
<p>It was also the conference where Twitter came of age.&nbsp; There were some wonderful snippets flowiing past. I hope we can capture them for posterity.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6548251.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Alan's Blog</title><dc:creator>Nigel Paine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:29:03 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/2010/2/3/alans-blog.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">101447:892711:6543652</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>A blogger who simply calls himself Alan, has written <a href="http://toughguide.blogspot.com/2010/01/5-mistakes-smart-people-make.html">a great piece</a> on <em>5 Mistakes Smart People Make </em>in his Blog:&nbsp; <strong>Tough Guide to Work</strong><em>. </em>His focus is work and work-based issues.&nbsp; Amongst the 5 mistakes he lists is one: 'You are good at things you don't enjoy'. in other words we can learn by practice how to do things that don't instinctively inspire us, and there are strengths that we have, that can remain underdeveloped.&nbsp; Alan puts it rather neatly in the diagram below:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.nigelpaine.com/storage/strengths2.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1265193672842" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Many of us confuse our realised strengths and learned behaviours to the point of convinving ourselves that what we are good at, is what we like;&nbsp; and they are not necessariky the same thing at all.&nbsp; This is exactly the point that Ken Robinson is making in his book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Element-Finding-Passion-Changes-Everything/dp/0670020478">The Element</a>.&nbsp; It is more important to get 'in your element' ie follow your passion, than pursue something because everyone tells you, you are good at it.&nbsp; The book is subtitled:&nbsp; <em>how finding your passion changes everything</em>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The real question is how you can help someone find that passion; or even more difficult, suggest to someone that what they do, may not be what they should be doing.&nbsp; And there is a hard balance to achieve as an indivudual, between listening to what people tell you, and listening to what your head (and heart) are saying.&nbsp; We all put a huge premium on acclaim, and ignore those contradictory, internal voices.&nbsp; Being smart is learning fast and well, but being smarter is not being controlled by what we learn, and ignoring what really gives us energy.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6543652.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Changing World</title><dc:creator>Nigel Paine</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:40:43 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/2010/1/22/changing-world.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">101447:892711:6397749</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone should read <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/comment/hamish-mcrae/hamish-mcrae-china-is-a-hungry-teenager-eating-up-resources-ndash-and-we-cant-stop-it-1875397.html">Hamish McRae"s wonderful article</a> in <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">the Independent</a> about projected economic growth over the next twenty years. called: "China is a hungry teenager eating up resources- and we can't stop it."</p>
<p>The US is still a massive world economic power that dwarfs the current second biggest ecomony: ($14 trillion GDP as opposed to just over $5 trillion).&nbsp; But twenty years' hence, China soars to $26.5 trillion and the US lags at nearly $23 trillion. But what is equally astonishing&nbsp; is the third largest economy is India at $7.5 trilion (ie larger than China now) and Brazil is fifth at $4.25 trillion.&nbsp; This is a new economic order.&nbsp; The graph makes this clear.</p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.nigelpaine.com/storage/china.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1264163173970" alt=""/></span></span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>And, incidently, the data comes from the <a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/02/index.htm">IMF</a> and another organisation in the news: <a href="http://www.goldmansachs.com">Goldman Sachs</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp; Amongst all the hooha about Goldman Sachs one little fact never gets any acknolwedgement :&nbsp;</p>
<p><em><span class="gs_art_leadIn" style="color: #666666;">"A hallmark of the Goldman Sachs culture is its commitment to the  development of its people."</span></em></p>
<p>Goldman Sachs has always been amongst the great investors in staff  learning and it seems to be paying off!</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6397749.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>10 Top Gadgets of the Decade</title><dc:creator>Nigel Paine</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 01:55:37 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/2010/1/1/10-top-gadgets-of-the-decade.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">101447:892711:6185729</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/">Fast Company</a> (I love that Magazine) lists <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/pics/gadgets-decade">the best gadget of the year</a> from 2000 to 2009.&nbsp; Starts with the Flash Drive for 2000 and ends with the Kindle 2 and other e readers for 2009.&nbsp; Interesting choices (and runners up listed) PS2 makes runner up only.&nbsp; The bumper year is 2007 when three gadgets tie:&nbsp; Wii, the Flip Camera and the iPhone.&nbsp; Hard to choose between them and hard to imagine life without the iPhone!&nbsp; But maybe that is me.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.nigelpaine.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6185729.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>